Awaiting reviewer response. The status of the paper changed several times.

Awaiting reviewer response We are still awaiting a response from the Microsoft exchange incident. Back To Top. It means reviewers have been invited but have not responded to the invitation. Rejected at stage of waiting to go to meeting Awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Objectives To describe gender and geographical inequalities in invitations to review and the response to these invitations and to assess whether inequalities increased during the covid-19 pandemic. Women agreed to review less often than did men, with no difference across the time periods. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Dear Team; In OJS3. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. If you would like to use the phrase “I await your response” or “awaiting your response” those are both fine as well. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. Patiently awaiting your response. However, I definitely remember the last two: Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point-by-point response to the reviewer's comments with their revised I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Find out what happens when your article is awaiting reviewer response and how long it takes to get a decision. Awaiting your reply, Mr. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. 0 Kudos. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. x the filter option is very good and helpful. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. So, please give me The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Please revise your paper to respond to all of the comments by The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. Setting 19 specialist medical journals and two large general medical journals from BMJ Publishing Group. But the editor, for some reason, e. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. This is particularly important in the current Article submitted后（即paper提交后）： 1、awaiting admin. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Server for them to correct this. without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. This is most commonly known as the ‘Response to reviewers’. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Is the right of review cancled because the too long response from the revoked reviewer? What will happen next? Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Dear Dr. Information for IJRR Reviewers. Next, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation and remained so for a week. Cite The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. However, on the same day, the In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. What does this mean? Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; Career Growth. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。2. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Tips for Responding to Reviewers’ Comments (runtime: 12:18) The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. Cite. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. ” (Here, the phrase might come off as sarcastic or passive-aggressive. The article may have been single or double anonymously peer reviewed before publication. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? I submitted my paper to one of the IEEE Transactions journals. E-Mail Notifications and Reminders: contains all the reminders sent to editors and reviewers for tasks Motivation: After 27 weeks, we received a very positive review and a very negative one. Since the workflow was designed to show messages only to those participants who need to act, this message is I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. (3) Should I attach a response document for reviewers' comments? I found no exact place for a response document in the submission system. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Awaiting Release from Hold Decision on proposal is postponed pending receipt of additional information from applicant. It has been almost two weeks without any The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. e. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the comments. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. The e-mail might come embedded with hyperlink invitation responses. " After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 11; supplementary table E). A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. You should include a point-by-point reply that addresses each suggestion when you submit the revised article. 2. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. Harper. 28 in review process 2021. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Vicky Mountford-Brown mentioned that finding suitable peer reviewers is a difficult process, especially those who can understand and appreciate neurodivergent perspectives. Table of Contents. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点： 1. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. The success of the response in addressing any concerns or questions raised by reviewers can be vital in In this comprehensive guide, we will explore various formal and informal ways to say “awaiting your response. 4w次，点赞4次，收藏26次。Elsevier 投稿各种状态总结1. You may also wish to comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if But this could be either the “response due date” or the “review due date Hi, In 3. 画面下の「Change Manuscript I submitted the revised paper one month after receiving the comments. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. Design Retrospective cohort study. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. For instance, it works well when emailing clients. The status has been the same for a few days. I also noticed that A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. some reviewers agree to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Response to comment 3. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After several days, it became "1 reviewer(s) accepted". Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". Red = overdue - Red outline = recently overdue - Orange outline = will be overdue soon - Blue outline = waiting for the reviewer to accept or complete the review To help editors understand and learn Dr. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2。awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. If you want to remain polite and friendly, stick with something familiar like “I look forward to hearing back. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. Under review also can mean that the article is being considered by the science editor for technical and English language check or it is with the subject editor and he is evaluating it for external review, or the article is I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 Thank you for your question. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. g. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Editor here. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. In this section:. All page numbers refer to the revised manuscript file with tracked changes. ). The reviewer’s comments, author responses and editorial decision letters are published alongside the final published article, in citable form. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Population Reviewers The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Vicky Mountford-Brown and Dr. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for 34 Response to Reviewer #4 35 Q1. Revise and respond to all editor and reviewer comments. This document is submitted alongside your revised manuscript, summarizing the changes that you made in response to the critiques. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. 10. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. There is no set time for this to take. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. " Required Reviews Complete: This indicates that the author has submitted the revised document (and a point-by-point response to the reviewer's comments, if required). The status of the paper changed several times. Those changes are highlighted within the manuscript. Waiting for Your Reply. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 我在scholarone manuscript系统上投了一篇文章，awaiting RE assignment 3天后变成 awaiting reviewers' response，然后又过了9天左右，变成了awaiting reviewer scores，现在已经10天了，按照字面理解awaiting reviewers' response应该就是已经送外审了吧， The reasons can be several but they will mention them when they respond. We hope that this greater transparency will improve the quality of the review process, give more recognition to Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. As we mentioned in the response to Comment 2 from you, critical appraisal questions proposed by Tierney et al(2) have been added in our criteria for assessing the methodological quality of included IPD meta-analyses. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in • Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewers and add additional rows to the document as needed. Diterima dengan My paper underwent a revision. ” Additionally, we will provide valuable tips, examples, and even discuss regional variations when necessary. If a reviewer declines then the paper returns to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. It shows that your brand or company is fun A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). The two reviews were clearly contradictory on several points. Reviewers' Comments to the Authors: Reviewer 1 I have send my research for possible publication; after 45 days the status changed from round one (a review is overdue) to round two (awaiting reviewer comments). 9. Other time-efficient retrieval options. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. This I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. Editorassigned4 Negative Example: “You missed the last three meetings. A copy of your revised paper with the changes highlighted can also be very useful. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? 去年11月，我在老师的建议下投了一篇TMECH的文章，中间经过漫长的审稿、拒稿/大修，改稿、润色，最后到今天把大修的论文 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. 3 Thank you for your comments. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others What was the response for your manuscript. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Again, the Peer review process. Does it mean the work will be rejected? The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). The latter is a clear term that The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded accordingly and adequately. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Good luck. A well-crafted "response to reviewers" document is a critical part of your response. 1. Witheditor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：3. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. Ditolak 2. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Dr. 4e Awaiting publisher Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to be sent to the author(s). The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Can you please explain what it is going on? If they do not provide a satisfactory response or are likely to take longer with their decision, you may consider withdrawing the manuscript and submitting to But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. 4,663 Views. When the paper was sent to reviewers, they reviewed within one month. The amount of time you will be given to make your revisions will reflect the extent of changes required. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 11. It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. ) Personal Experience and Expertise. 3. . , by asking us to refute the critiques, by inviting an additional reviewer, or by evaluating I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿 The title says it all. However, I just noticed that the status of my Clarivate Analytics | ScholarOne Manuscripts™ Reviewer User Guide Page 2 . 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. 1 (also in the previous OJS3 versions), when any reviewer does not respond within the due date, the status message changes to “A review is overdue”. Reviewers Invited - one or more reviewers have been invited and we are awaiting their response. to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper In this case, our advice to this author, which was passed via the RCP, was to wait for 6-8 weeks to hear back from the journal (based on the average time to first response stated on the journal’s website) and then to write a politely-worded email to the editor to request more information, suggesting some additional names and emails for I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Popular answers (1) Oluwadara Pelumi Omotayo. Awaiting Reviewer Reports - the paper has been sent to the reviewer(s) and we are awaiting their report. Possibly to likely (the reviewers are still experts, they already know the paper (reduce work load). Do not email to ask about 有作者咨询：论文状态awaiting reviewer assignment 的意思，这是初审环节的一个状态，代表等待分配审稿专家，在整个sci论文发表过程中，论文状态会有多个变化，具体说明如下： 1、编辑初审阶段会看到的状态 Manuscript Submitted/Manuscript received by Editorial Office——投稿已到杂志社 The reviewers response and your response ti their enquiry and how the editors get satisfied with the revised version finally determine the fate of your paper. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. Revision deadlines will vary between publishers. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. This message is visible to the author as well which should not. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. For guidance, use the Author Response to Reviewers Template. 2b First peer reviewer allocated The first peer reviewer has accepted to conduct a review of the paper. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? If you do not get a satisfactory response, pull it and Awaiting vs. Message 21 of 23. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Is this normal or should I be worried? When submitting your revised paper, you should also send in a detailed list of changes and reply to each referee. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. ” It’s a great phrase to include in a more light-hearted situation. The document is now awaiting a check by the journal's editorial office. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Now, the status is Awaiting EIC Decision. Funding Sources; Grant Application; Science Communication. If you select the Agreed I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Selecting the appropriate hyperlink sends the response to the journal and updates the system with your response. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough Learn about the stages of peer review for your article submission to a BMJ journal. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. • When referring to specific text in your manuscript using the below table, please include the original sentence and the revised sentence so that the changes are clear for the reviewers, including the line number. Again this time, no reviewer was assigned for 2 months. But all of a what is the meaning of the status " awiting for reviewer responce meaning"? doe sit means that there is a reviewer who accepted to review or may be we just waitng responce ( to accept to review"??) what is the meaning of recieved responce (0/4)? Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. It seems to me that the processing at all levels Our journals depend on our bank of reviewers to assess the quality and usefulness of the 47,000 manuscripts we receive each year. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. One reviewer have endorsed the publication, however, another reviewer showed "revoked" in the Frontier interactive review table. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Too frequently, authors focus on revising the manuscript itself and spend too little time making the response document clear and updated article, any supplementary information, and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. It took 10 days to go from Under Review to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Please see below, in blue, for a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. 4. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. For most manuscripts, in the A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. How to avoid a desk reject Choose the right journal Journal Recommender Get support with writing and formatting SAGE Author Services Carefully check the submissions guidelines on the journal’s homepage. 问：论文小修后为什么会出现awaiting reviewer assignment不应该直接返回原来审稿人那边，然后原来审稿人审吗. This may, however, vary across journals. The interaction between the reviewer’s gender and the time period and topic was not significant (P=0. Click on “Take Action. Be the first to reply. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the reviewers. They assigned an AE. Rejected at stage of awaiting PI response Awaiting Meeting. What does this mean? Will it go for review? "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on; The reviewer is familiar with all aspects of the manuscript I submitted a paper to some journal. ” It has been almost 2 months now. 2. 文章浏览阅读2. Then, the status remained unchanged for three weeks. 2c Two or more peer Awaiting author/peer reviewer confirmation Query regarding revised manuscript, which has been received. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Reviewers are asked to provide a report within 14 days for Letters After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. However, the editor can change the reviewers, in case one gave a bad review (in terms of quality). ” Invitation Response E-Mails: the automatic response e-mails following a reviewers invitation response. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. reviewers. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. Responding to reviews UKRI and a number of other funders give Principal Investigators (PIs) the opportunity to respond to comments made by reviewers during the assessment process. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. A few days ago, the status was "reviewers invited". The correct response is “waiting for your reply” because of the inserted preposition. , "Awaiting AE decision". Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Using the menu to the left find out more about the peer review process, how to review and how to become a reviewer for BMJ. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. In my professional experience, I’ve used “Patiently awaiting your response” in emails to show anticipation and respect. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. Kelly Forbes-Simpson discussed how feedback from peer reviewers can sometimes be brutal and discouraging, particularly for early career I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again In December 2020, I submitted a paper to Frontiers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Peer reviewers have been invited and asked to respond rapidly. Moreover, the negative one was full of factual errors. The editor made no effort to reconcile the contradictions between the two reviews (e. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? I submitted my paper to a journal. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. Awaiting Initial Reviewers Rejected at stage of awaiting reviewers to be assigned Awaiting Response. The journal told me If reviewers from the previous round are not available (no response or decline to re-review), then it is the task of the editor to evaluate if the comments have been addressed satisfactorily. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Hi. " Does this Reviewers’ response to invitations by geographical affiliation and gender during and before the pandemic. The chapter also offers suggestions for handling conflicting We are still awaiting a response from several potential sources including the National Council of State Legislatures and the Department of Public Health and . I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. " Related reading: Why Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. We think other methods that improve retrieval time efficiency without 36 changing the prototype support are complementary to our approach; we aim to improve bothmemory and time efficiency 37 by reducing prototype size. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. RESPONDING TO AN INVITATION . I am really Reviewer--审稿人。（Article要求两个审稿人＋AE，总共三个人审。communication只有一个人审，这个人或者是编辑部指定的审稿人，或者是AE） Article submitted后 1。awaiting admin. Really, I didn’t understand how the journal can jump to the the second round review stage without sending me any comments from the first round to make the suggested corrections? 了解"awaiting reviewer scores"意味着什么及所需等待时间，首先需要理解这一阶段在SCI期刊出版流程中的位置。一般情况下，这一阶段需根据期刊的具体要求来判断，通常在1个月左右，但有时可能在15天内，或长达2个月。 2021. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I Look Forward to Hearing Back. Still the status is same. Securing Research Funding. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which The chapter provides an in-depth tutorial on responding to reviewer requests, prioritizing which requests to respond to first, how to respond to different editorial styles, and how to use the response letter to “push back” against reviewer requests without being combative. Rejected. Or, the reviewers' reports come in and they are conflicting, so the editor wants more reviews to help him/her make a decision. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. thwnotp msuc szfs julelf yujdbx qwks wjrq whng myfm mytptmr