Awaiting reviewer selection example For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? These documents contain examples of outstanding reviewer reports in the fields of: Smart materials; Laser-induced fluorescence; Plasmas; Medical imaging; Quantum computing; Cosmology; Medical physics; Piezoelectric energy . It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Resources for authors and journals Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. This change has occurred I submitted a research paper to a journal. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. If this makes sense, The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The questions editors ask reviewers. Reject without a valid reason after complaining to the editor. Follow this Question. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Here, what does 'CE' mean? “awaiting reviewer selection” is automatic and does not indicate a re-submission. For example, are the keywords broad enough to lure in readers with a broad interest in the topic but narrow enough to accurately reflect the Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. But the editor, for some reason, e. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? example is the value of F0 and Fm shown by commercial instruments. For example: The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of the submission; The reviewer should not have recently (COPE recommend 3 years) collaborated with any of I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Forms Tracking. – Parnian. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if For example, I have attached one of our recent responses to a reviewer. as your example illustrates. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which 6. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your Reviewer’s Guide Peer review is essential for filtering out poor quality articles by assessing the validity and integrity of the research. " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". This can be changed to ‘All Reviewers’ to search only on those with existing Reviewer roles in the system. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. The status of the paper changed several times. 2. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Commented Jan 21, Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. What does it mean if the status date changes while the status remains with editor? Question. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers When inviting reviewers, it’s necessary to ensure that there is no conflict of interest with the authors. For example, did you get a reply? – user68958. A mentor's voice for younger or inexperienced candidates is a prime example of this. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, 2. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. I also tried to contact the editor through the mail, but unfortunately, For example, a paper with new and correct results that are, The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. Given the times, waiting 15 days really doesn't Specific examples. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the The statute “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. So, we have made some edits/assumptions. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. Again, the It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the . Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. – 1 Peer Reviewer Selection Process. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) Under the My Publication option, a search form appears allowing you to set criteria and begin the search of your EM database. " Does this So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded, "We’re awaiting the final reviewer's comments. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Unbiased consideration is given to all manuscripts offered for publication regardless of whether or not the authors request publication on an open access basis and regardless of the race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, political I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. ; But the Statute is very generous to Commissioners. ], but usually no units are shown (in fact, Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. When inviting reviewers, it’s necessary to ensure that there is no conflict of interest with the authors. The statute here allows a choice. However, on the same day, the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Selection of suitable reviewers by the editor. (4) Finally, each reviewer should be assigned to approximately the same number of manuscripts to balance their workload. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. Do not email to ask about I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. I have previously published in the same journal For example, let’s imagine that your research paper is stuck ‘awaiting reviewer comments’ and two months have passed with no news from the journal. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. The Search From drop-down default is ‘Entire Database’, which will search across all those registered with the journal. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. When i have contacted the editorial office, they The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. For example: The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of the submission; The reviewer should not have recently (COPE Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. PNAS averages 10 days from submission to initial decision, What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? 1. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. When the For example, if historical data used to train AI models reflects gender or geographical disparities in academic publishing, these biases could be reinforced in AI-assisted reviewer selection. Why Review a Paper? Each paper you submit generates about 3 reviews. Share. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. For example, One of my manuscript was submitted on 21st of June this year, but it is still showing " Awaiting Reviewer Selection " as status. Does anyone have any idea why Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. As one of the journals of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics uses the Geophysical Electronic Manuscript System (GEMS) for the submission, review, and the editorial processing of papers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. AWAITING REVIEWER RESPONSES •When the manuscript moves to the next task, the tab at the top right will change to correspond with the current queue. I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Another significant ethical consideration is the transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Reviewers are not always accurate with their comments and sometimes editors intervene, for example, The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. It can be clearly seen that the reviewer’s comments helped us to significantly improve the quality of the manuscript. Is Another case would be the conflict of interest. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. A specific threshold T can be defined to identify the qualifications of reviewers. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. This document contains examples of reviewer reports rated 1, 3 and 5. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. Can I assume my manuscript is going out to peer review!? This is my second choice of journal and it was desk rejected at the first so this would be one step better! :) The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Author dashboard status "Awaiting reviewer selection"? The previous status was "Awaiting allocation of AE". 4. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Some editorial systems give the Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. u. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. What does it mean? The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Here is a template you can use to help structure The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. That 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. 1. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. AE stands for Associate Editor. ; The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? thanks a lot. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Once enough reviewers have been selected, The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. There is no set time for this to take. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications Reviewers Guidelines. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I think that a correct presentation would be to say that the units are arbitrary [a. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. " For example, one of the reviewers may have accepted the online invitation initially; One of my manuscript was submitted on 21st of June this year, but it is still showing " Awaiting Reviewer Selection " as status. For example, the information and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4 The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer assignment" to "Reviewers Invited" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 12 Nov, 2019 . It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. These reviewer guidelines provide insight into the peer review process with an emphasis on information reviewers need to know to conduct and complete their recommendation. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. Thank you for your question. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Suggestion: Submit elsewhere. Okay, it has been sent for review again. 3. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. It is totally confusing. The well I'm not sure. Is this normal or should I be worried? Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. For example, many journals have area wise editors e. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. g. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Review Settings . SETTING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED REVIEWS Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". But today I noticed that the status changed again and it says 'Awaiting Reviewer Agreement'. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 15-6. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for Editor here. It was so for two months. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Asia, Europe, The area of a manuscript is based on the area of the corresponding author. View. ; The statute defined equality of all before the law. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 6. For example, reviewer #2 in What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. When a new manuscript is submitted, the assigned Editor has the 1. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. For most manuscripts, in the Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. Failing to take up references. We’ll be back in contact as soon as a decision is made". It has been noted that selection processes sometimes fail to check prospective employee references and background checks. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. I just thought after At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Reviewer Connect Results* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Does the article or case study say something original? Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. AWAITING REVIEWS. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. 1 Answer to this question. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Answer. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. ‘Dear Editor: I am writing on behalf of my co-authors to enquire about the status of I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Click on “Take Action. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). But the whole selection process needs to have a sense of experience and not just simply overlooking it. 21, awaiting AE decision. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. (3) At most, each reviewer should be assigned to a defined number of manuscripts, b j, chosen by the team responsible for assigning reviewers. I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. This may, however, vary across journals. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. Logging In 1. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Today it went Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a month. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. ; The statute also benefits Members of this House. Manuscripts may be released if revisions are not received, and the paper will have to be sub-mitted as a new manuscript. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Authors have 30 days to review and return their manuscript following reviewer and associate editor comments. Answer: In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. Does it mean the work will be The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. •Clicking on a reviewer’s name will open a new email to that reviewer. 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. OR. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v) Reviewer List. Then I revised and resubmitted. Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Q: What does "Awaiting reviewer selection" mean under "Minor Revision" in the ScholarOne Submission system? Detailed Question - After one day of submission, status was At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. The contributor form will be IOP journals are international in authorship and readership. Referees are carefully selected from the worldwide research community.
jkyyap qqjk fwrkc egx brxixg bbce cvseajftb auqf hqg deazgmdb