Best x265 movies reddit. 2016 BluRay 2160p Atmos TrueHD7 1 x265 10bit-CHD (Size - 14.

Best x265 movies reddit. UTR releases depend on size.

• Best x265 movies reddit However, it also depends on resolution. X265 10bit can he played back on capable hardware and in new generation tv's only. Still, they have them. . Most are 1080p Blu-Rays AVC Some are (horrid) VC-1 But I like my movie files to have the lossless audio, be it DTS-HD MA Atmos, Or DTS XLL Or Dolby TrueHD There just appears to be a massive variance in movie file sizes when I’m browsing through my indexer. 24 votes, 24 comments. 1 HEVC x265-HODL 104 45 1. A ~5gb x265 encode from Silence or Afm72 or somebody is going to look way better than a ~2gb x264 RARBG or YTS encode. Personally, I use CRF 17 for both 1080p and 4k. Most are 1080p Blu-Rays AVC Some are (horrid) VC-1 But I like my movie files to have the lossless audio, be it DTS-HD MA Atmos, Or DTS XLL Or Dolby TrueHD That's only the current hardware encoded AV1 that is just behind software encoded x265 with archival settings (but much faster to encode and no Ip issues). In handbrake with When it comes to the ideas of the best movies of all time, Reddit offers an incredible starting point for people looking for something to watch. 265 for movies so I can let the resolution in 1080 without using too much space) Constant quality: 15 RF Frame rate: same as source, and idk if is better variable or constant Encoder preset: Slow (i tried slower but my TV couldn't play them) Tune: Animation Encode Profile and Encode Level is in auto I don't use x265 because it takes more to process than other codecs, but the knowledge that x265 is just fine with a slightly higher quality setting than x264, is helpful to pass onto others. 264/HEVC SDR video up to 2160p, 60 fps, Main/Main 10 profile - HEVC Dolby Vision (Profile 5)/HDR10 (Main 10 profile)/HLG up to 2160p, 60 fps - H. I convert them via handbrake and select ac3 for 1080p videos. x265 doesn't halve the filesize. For the sake of example, I’ll search for Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban now 3. You can also use svt with preset 4 or 5 and be much more efficient than x265. 264 8bit (I use H. Pahe - Re-Encode, but not as good as PSA. 5-8 GB) also looks good in image quality with lower video bitrates. The ~8gb x264 and the ~5gb x265 will look pretty close. Quite a few are in x265 format. For example, I did a x265 encode of the Phantom Menace with 6. On your couch, you won't notice a difference between a 4K and 1080p movie from the same source on a 65 inch. But it also takes up more space and, depending on your speakers etc, you likely won't hear a difference. The specific example was a bluray 1080p movie, why it was 40gb in the first place is completely unknown to me. YG 97 64 1. I am starting with more limited space and I honestly can't tell much diff in a 4GB movie vs a 50GB movie. I've done double blind tests with lossless/lossy audio and with a sufficient bitrate I can't hear the difference. Beyond. Why is x265/HEVC not more common? Depends on the codec. Judas is the best encoder doing Kaguya in x265. the problem is possibly applying x265 compression to a video file that had already been compressed with x264, for best results x265 should be applied directly to the source video. 1 most of the time. 49GB x265 Blu-ray 1080p 3. Shaanig is the Yify of x265. Great coverage though, you can find obscure movies too. 25GB x265 1080p 2. A 2gb x265 video would be comparable to a 4gb x264 one, but a 20gb x265 video wouldn't be as stated some can't tell the difference between a small size RARBG 1080p x265, small size PSARip 1080p x265, and a larger QXR 1080p x265 unless they are sitting close to the screen or they have a BIG tv. Almost all x265 content is a re-encode of an existing encode resulting in lossy video quality PSARips, RMTeam absolutely. Also fast isn't a particularly well In August 2016, Netflix published a comparison of x264, VP9, and x265 using video clips from 500 movies and TV shows using 6 different quality metrics and found that both For x264 I'd want a filesize at least 400MB+. Is this the usual target or is it higher than normal? For content with tons of film grain: Ditch x265 for SVT-AV1 (10 bit of course) and use film-grain=20:film-grain-denoise=0:tune=0. File Size at similar quality: x265 < x264. As far as software goes, people have already recommended you Handbrake. showname. In 2018, I ran a few dozen encoding tests of live-action materials and found that in every single case with 8-bit inputs, the 10-bit encodes not only were smaller in file size but also looked better than the 8-bit encodes. Is it worth to get remux if im kinda trying to save space, is it big difference? There just appears to be a massive variance in movie file sizes when I’m browsing through my indexer. So i am am fairly new to downloading movies and i always see for example one movie with same name like web-dl but different encoders like Qxr or Tommy or Tigole just to name a few, so who do you concider as the best encoders or do they vary per every movie/show A gaming sub free from the news, hype and drama that surround current releases, catering instead to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. I'll try to explain it as simply as possible. That Movies folder (Not the mislebeled gay sweaty porn folder, dumbo, the real one) in your phone should only have PSA movies. So a 2gb movie at x265 is much better quality than 2gb x264 movie. I find tigole's rips not that good, and especially 4K HDR ones. For high quality encodes, it still makes sense to use x264 for some people due to faster encoding and better compatibility, and the people who use x265 do so because it functions differently from x264 wrt dealing with blocking and banding etc, not EVR is Enhanced Video Renderer, and it's supposed to be the default video renderer for PotPlayer. I've started using Doom9 user H2Sixty's general purpose H. For a typical 2 hour movie you're looking at around 30GB for a 1080p Remux, 15GB once it's been compressed with x264 or around 5GB once it's been compressed with x265. Open the file in MediaInfo and compare the settings with that table. For most movies I encode at 2000 kbps h265. Or go to File Pursuit (web search) select videos put in x265 and search there. Good question! I've never noticed or measured the extra CPU time, but I think it's about the same speed. If you want, and find looseless BD, it's going to be really huge, like 100x or HEVC has gained quite the traction in the past few years and there are very many good releases. m4v, . Some people have higher standards for how much detail should be retained than others and some shows require much more bitrate. I didn't make comparison of the same title but FRDS releases (4. Share insights, get tips, and stay updated with Radarr. But Rapidmoviez is my preferred and the x265 section there. " the 4K HDR versions, usually end up looking a LOT worse than the SDR versions if you compare 4K bluray to HD bluray of the same movie. I use Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital+ because I use Roku devices Any movies shot on digital cameras or cgi parts in older movies can be considered lossless. 1/7. Especially if it's a movie that I watched once when it came out and now just want to store a copy. For movies I like a lot, and grainy videos, 2-pass. The best quality movies are Tigole 1080p x265 movies and Tigole 2160p x265 movies. Some are small like from Joybell (UTR uploader). I had to change it myself. For VMAF comparisons, the best x265 tune is probably PSNR (disables adaptive quant, psy-rd, and cutree) since there's no tune VMAF. However, GJM has the best subtitles for it (It's a fansub group). It doesn't happen with all x265 videos, but most. Personally, I download only Remuxes and then encode them to x265. Trek. So a 5gb x265 file will always be better than a 1gb x265 file, buat a 5gb x265 file will also be better than a 5gb x264 file. 2016 BluRay 2160p Atmos TrueHD7 1 x265 10bit-CHD (Size - 14. Realistically HEVC offers roughly a 30% improvement over AVC, so a ~5gb x265 movie is probably comparable to an 8gb x264 encode of the same movie, even moreso if the latter was just done on defaults. 0 GB S01e01 [1080p Ita Eng Spa h265 10bit Subs][MirCrewRelease] byMe7al 98 26 1. For example, if you have a 100 minute file and you require ~10GB. It doesn't need to be 10+GB, but 3-4GB will almost always be great. Then movies that I personally am about to watch I usually upgrade it to a 1080 Remux just for fun (What goods a locally hosted server if you're not watching the best possible quality!) I was converting/compressing anime to 720 using this settings H. Who's the best for "quality for size" ratio? Consideration for space: I don't need to have the absolute smallest size but I'd rather YTS: i know these aren't x265 uploaders but there are some movies with no good x265 release and sometimes yts has the best version available out there, for me they are a last resort Despite popular opinion that qxr (mainly tigole) rips are best, i beg to differ. PSArips: x265 : best, this much you expect from a x265 file. If you want subtitles then get then from subscene. Eg: Soul (Tigole) PSArips : x265 : best, this much you expect from a x265 file. And is far superior to anything Shaanig can do. I'd up the bframes to ≥8 in Handbrake's Advanced Options and maybe zone the credits too, especially if they're long, at According to Apple's tech specs: Video Formats-H. Her releases are maximum of 2gb if its a movie. I guess ANT and PTP have x265 movies too but they are a lot bigger than you're used to if you used RARBG for example. For official support, check our Discord and GitHub channels available at: https://radarr. The rest such as character movies and titles not likely to be watched more than once or twice I'm perfectly content with RARBG x265. 2160p WEBDL Ita Eng x265-NAHOM 90 34 10. For movies like Dune I keep the lossless audio track which pushes the size up, but for other movies that aren't the heavy hitters, I usually go with a lossy track as it's hard to hear a difference especially with non effects driven movies. video However, their movie selection is not that good and they don't have a lot of old movies. = ) (It's higher by about 2 points on average. I compared Jujutsu Kaisen's HEVC BDMV Remux release (~6 GB per episode) to an x265 encode (~400mb) and they looked pretty much identical to me. If I was in your situation I would either buy more HDDs, encode directly No tv p2p groups of any quality actually use x265 Absolutely incorrect. Assuming you have a good HDR TV that works well for other HDR Content of Netflix, etc. For live action, high grain, high motion, low light level content (like a Batman Begins-type film) an x265 encode should use at least 90% of the bitrate of a comparable x264 encode to get the same quality. It likely isn't the best and I'm still looking for a faster solution but so far the best success I've had (with keeping quality while still getting excellent compression) is through the use of ffmpeg (built from source) and the "-x265-params lossless" setting. A 2gb x265 video would be comparable to a 4gb x264 one, but a 20gb x265 video wouldn't be as good as a 40gb x264 one. 1080p. Welcome to /r/Radarr – the central hub for Radarr enthusiasts. I set it up only for my movie library to test it out as my series library is far bigger and more important to me, but I'm completely amazed with the results and as soon as it finishes processing the movies I will add the tv series for processing. RARBG x265 is shit - worst (rarbg, TEPES, ION265, ION10), why they even encode if put such shit quality Hello guys. I download the best available quality(and highest file size). Most other movies, comedies, dramas etc I'll keep with 1080. e. PSA - Best Re-Encodes (Encodes of Encodes) for Mobile phones, small size acceptable quality. 266 is better quality at the same bitrate as HEVC. I'm always perplexed that if searching for a show, usually there will be a 1080P h264 upload That being said my taste is a wide variety, so I'll keep my thriller, comedy low action type movies in the smaller size and I'm starting a 4k collections for anything action or fast paced, I generally don't get remuxes unless it's a blockbuster or a movie I love to bits which is pretty much nothing new really probably 15 or 20 movies in the last 15 years I couldn't live without tbh lol. HEVC scales better with higher resolution. HEVC gives you better quality at lower bitrates. ANT is still quite accessible, PTP, good luck :p This isn't true btw. So 4k is 4 times as big a resolution Remuxes are usually x265, because why not. Recently switched over to usenet from torrents, loving the download speeds, but generally not loving the download sizes. to or from magnetdl. torrents are littered with x265 nowadays, wondering if anyone has any recommendations on this for usenet before shelling out anymore Still x265 in 2019 is in its early stage. The latter had a video bitrate of around 2000 kbps. mkv too, but I have to convert them because of DTS. So small size 1080p encodes are going to get smaller. Never happens with h264. I dont understand how some movies are 15-20gigs in 4k and others are 50-100gigs 4k movies. What do I need to watch a x265/HEVC movie (I think it‘s a . WEB. Eg: Soul. I don't save much space on the movie side because I typically replace it with a similarly sized x265 file to enjoy the higher quality. 1 Opus audio at 384 kbits and it was around Visually appealing films, major studio action films etc I'll likely go 4K. Action movies, CGI movies, and movies likely to be watched numerous times such as holiday flicks are likely to qualify for higher encodes (by my standards) such as 5-10 GB. Between the ones you usually find in sites like nyaa for weekly series (judas, ssa, yui, asw, etc) which one is the best 17 votes, 27 comments. 7 GB An x264 and x265 encode of the same Blu-ray Disc source at the same bitrate will favor the x265 encode. Keep in mind that quality is very subjective, though. Plus the x264 copy doesnt TL has loads of series packs too in x265, crazy stuff. H264-Dual. 0. FLUX for WEB-DLs as I trust their releases to be from the best web source available, BHDStudio for movies since it's the perfect balance between size and quality for me and if there wasn't a BHDStudio release for a specific title, I'd grab a release from reputable encoding groups such as well known HDB/AHD groups "DON, SbR, TayTo, VietHD, NCmt, D-Z0N3, TDD. Let me know if you guys have found an alternative. Digital vs (lots of) film grain, how much work was done on the raw (filtering, denoising etc. Still x264 at best encode setting can beat x265 at best. All WEB* are web/streaming rips. Positives: x265 2160p HDR releases are lower in file sizes and HEVC = x265. All the x265 releases out there on public trackers are brilliant if you don't care for the overall Now I'm not going for the absolute highest video quality, I aim for around 8-9, maybe 10GB for 1080p movies from BluRay. I will passthrough Atmos and DTS-X, however, to keep the object based audio track. g. Movies have been around x265 is roughly twice as good at 1080p. If you look at scene encodes, they typically stick between CRF 17 and 13, depending on what the video entails (i. What are the best settings for this in tdarr? Probably don't need anything fancy, and all are in 1080p - wish to keep quality as close to original file as possible The reason for this is because grain is really difficult to encode efficiently because its so unpredictable, so for example with h265 if you want to encode a grainy movie youll either end up with a large file size due to the grain or you remove the intended look of the movie with denoising. For movies that I don't value very much or don't mind losing details, I'm using CRF13-16, copying what scene releases generally use. ), anime vs. But if you consider size to quality ratio then x265 movie is good to go. 39GB H264 Blu-ray 1080p 424 votes, 185 comments. Yep, I also made myself powershell script that runs over download folder of x265 1080p rarbg and removes all exe, txt and do the magic with subtitles for all languages I need removing the rest. It's a number I reckon is good for most situations. Slowly starting to build a movie/tv show library on my NAS. 22 GB) So i am currently going through my movie library (5TB, 476 films) and re-encoding in x265/HEVC 10 bit. So I'd like to hear where you go to for your movies and TV. How much you can shrink a source file depends on many aspects. 265 settings with VerySlow, no tuning. live action, movie vs TV series, frame rate, 4k vs 1080p vs 720p etc. x265 isn't too different. FLAC is a lossless audio codec. Yes. But a ~2gb x265 Joybell release is gonna look way worse than an ~8gb x264 FGT copy. They even follow the same naming convention, e. Where can i find a good guide that shows me best x265 encode settings in Handbrake from Remux movies ? Use preset slow, and the rest defaults Second thingIs it possible to set a GB target for a moviei mean if a movie is 30GB large is possible in Handbrake to set it 15GB or less and let the program decide datarate etc ? IIRC, they were just 2-pass slow settings, aq-mode was changed to 3, I think. 10GB in x265 is great quality if you take it from a ~25GB movie. Eg: any psarip file. 1 Opus audio at 384 kbits and it was around • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. For x265 movies (4K) I prefer SWTYBLZ, TERMiNAL, These crf settings are with x264 encoding and the slow preset with SD material. GJM encodes in x264 and their filesizes are larger than HorribleSubs, but you could download Judas for the video and Extract the subs from the GJM video, retime it and play it with the Judas one. File size and quality are similar too. x265. 1080p-INFINITY. S01. 264 Baseline Profile level 3. UPDATE: Best I've been able to glean so far is that in many cases, the source material isn't available in h265 encodes (and often if it is, it's very low bitrate and worse perceptual quality than h264), and since re-encoding leads to quality loss etc, sometimes h264 is the best you can get. So i am currently going through my movie library (5TB, 476 films) and re-encoding in x265/HEVC 10 bit. These suit my setup best due to their balance of quality and smaller file size compared to BD Remux, which my equipment doesn't fully utilize. QxR : x265 : Excellent, always go for it. Yep, I like finding rare movies on BeiTai but I'm confused about why some of their titles' video bitrates and encode sizes (9-17GB) are higher and sometimes x2 of KeepFRDS's encodes. com For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. Or go to the opendirectories reddit and browse through links provided there movies or TV shows. HDR. It will be significantly faster than CPU conversion with x265. If you pay close enough attention there is a noticeable quality drop but I've grown to care less. The x265 encoder usually does a good job, but h265/HEVC in general is super slow and non-asic GPU acceleration is apparently quite difficult for h265 (something about inter-frame dependencies and scatter/gather ops being bad for GPUs & gpu-to-cpu transfer latency). I now have radarr configured to download movies that are 2-3Gb 1080p and prefer x265. So a 6gb pack with all the featurettes from QxR vs an ~8gb x264 copy from whoever is usually a better way to go. true. x264 is advertised as being lossless, but that doesn't mean it does not change the integrity of the data so it should not be compressed again using x265. Title pretty much sums it up. So 4k hevc has better compression than 720p hevc. The movie file size is the biggest and you can get Tigole movies from 1337x. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. com by using torrents. UTR releases depend on size. That is, x265 seems smaller and better at the moment because the settings used are much inferior in comparison to x264 for quality encodes of high bitrate HD movies and tv. animations, bright/dark scenes, film grain, etc). HEVC it's the smaller with good quality. X265 has no problem as such when encoded at 8bit but problem arises when x265 is in 10bit. Theres no such thing as optimal bitrate because it depends so heavily on the specific show and also your eyes. mkv file) on my ps4 pro via the media player app? Some of my vacation videos are in . HEVC (x265) requires a lower bitrate to achieve roughly the same quality as an x264 video encoded from the same source. I read somewhere that H. 20 and prior versions. 4K. Half the size will be the same quality, and a 1GB x265 movie will look like just as much garbage as a 2GB x264 Yify. Shit encodes. x265-ELITE 103 141 1. 3 GB . 1080p it's the video resolution. At low bitrates, x265 can produce similar quality to x264 at half the filesize, but not when you're trying to go for high quality. Realworld HEVC offers on average 30% better efficiency than AVC, so a ~5gb x265 encode . Play with the strength to match the source footage (keep film-grain-denoise at 0 and also tune at 0 for the VQ tune) and reduce the RF until you're happy with the quality. An x264 and x265 encode of the same Blu-ray Disc source at the same bitrate will favor the x265 encode. 0 or lower with AAC-LC audio up to 160Kb/s per channel, 48kHz, stereo audio in . sc/10edko4 And as far as quality i agree that too many x265 reencoders go for the smallest size possible but there are plenty that offer reasonable middle grounds (QxR). However, "good" is highly subjective when it comes to video encoding. GPU encoding is faster, but the files will be bigger to get the same quality as a CPU encoded file, which negates a lot of the reason for using x265 in the first place. currently subscribed to geek, looking to add another indexer or 2 but looking for smaller files. even with VS10 engine on a zidoo z9 ot a appleTV, it just looks bad imho - even with full dolbyvision metadata - but it totally depends on how critical you are , do a side by side and decide for your self With RARBG now closed, I'm on the hunt for alternative sources for 4K UHD Blu-ray downloads, specifically BD Rips with HDR and x265 encoding. I had to stop using recyclarr for this reason - it insisted on quality settings which would increase the size of my library by over 10x. 5gb x264 file. In my experience, it works better than the lighter MadVR scaling filters without slowing down my high-entry-level laptop (i5-5200U) like the more intense MadVR scaling methods do. Eg: any psarip file RARBG x265 is shit - worst (rarbg, TEPES, ION265, ION10, EVO), why they even encode if put such shit quality Or try x265 tv or x265 movies in DuckDuckGo and see what you get. Star. S01E01. 14GB x264 Blu-ray 720p 6. Mostly. He explains his testing methodology in the linked thread, and that these settings are chosen for subjective detail retention, with a I've had the same issue for years on Win 8 with VLC 3. The problem with reading a true 10bit file on an 8bit display is that the ends of the colour range will get cut off resulting in a flat (gray looking image). QXR have very high standards and encode Only from the highest quality WEB-DL or Bluray Remux available. S01E01 1080p WEBRip DD5. You would do 10 * 1,000,000 [covert gigabytes to kilobytes] * 8 [converts bytes I use 10-bit x265 and Opus/AAC 5. If you have an Nvidia GPU, use NVENC for H265 conversion. That's how it saves space -- by being able to generate smaller files. 8 GB . I'm doing it like this: https://prnt. I'm trying to find best settings to enconde any x264 video to x265 with this program. 39GB H264 Blu-ray 1080p Then run x265 10 bit 2 pass with that average bitrate on the slowest speed you can handle. It does take more Best x265 software and time/quality settings? Im thinking of changing my bluray encodes from x264 in handbrake to x265 to squeeze out a little more space. mov file formats Hi, I have many movies in x264 and id like to transcode them all to be x265 to save space. Yes, lossless is technically the BEST in terms of absolute quality. 0 GB . Just make sure you have set the right selection behaviours for audio and subtitles, before adding all tracks to your queue. For movies, 10bit files are encoded with h265 (HEVC) as compared to h264 for 8bit. What are Your X265 Release Group as of END 2019 List: x265 [All File Sizes] PSA,TiGole,QxR,UTR,Vyndros only X264 8bit SDR & Compare a UTR release to a Shaanig one. 07GB x264 Blu-ray 1080p 7. In summary, I noticed 2-pass is a lot more consistent when retaining details, partly because it looks at the entire movie, rather than just every specific frame. For movies I like and watch a lot, 8000 kbps (roughly) for 1080p in h264. -x264 was around 18-20 IMO, the best alternative I've found is INFINITY. The question is - I hope - simple: what's a good compromise between bitrate and file size? I want to focus on 4k x265 content and I've been downloading 50-60mbps bitrates that add up to an average of 50-70gb files. Older movies shot on film would be considered lossless at 8k. mp4 and . DV. A 5gb x265 file will be comparable to a ~7. Different people have different perceptions of what "good quality" is, and so the bitrate required Right now if you use x265 and x264 with roughly equivalent settings the x264 will look better at the same bitrate. wepwwms hkcwex xlijmy fxz cxieqp syyfi ggyxd hlka yvqqfn qifohl