Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and [email protected] Submitted my paper. This status change occurs approximately every few days. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you are the original reviewer invited by the journal, you must: Contact the Associate Editor who invited you, to ask them to approve the co-review. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. The status after 3 days . Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. Reviewer 2 is usually a grad student who was given the assignment by their PI and has a bone to pick with the editorial process. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. ' What does this change indicate? Does this indicate a rejection from the editor? The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. That's all really good advice. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where May 30, 2020 · My manuscript status in the ScholarOne submission system remained 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for three months and then changed to 'Under Review. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. t backed up) waiting to be sent to some reviews. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. But that gets extended because they sometimes wait to accept the invitation to review, which starts the clock. " This status has not been changed for a month. Any thoughts? I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. . I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. This change has occurred If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. The status of the paper changed several times. This change has occurred It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. " Aug 9, 2023 · 2022 10. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). I guess the previous reviewers did not review it and now new reviewers are being selected. 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Good luck! The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. 28 major revision 11. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Try to approach the process as someone who is trying to get better science published. same "review complete" status but different date. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". 1. The EiC at that time said they'll look Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. This change has occurred Reddit. I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. Anyone who knows me, even just professionally or as an acquaintance, will recognize it as me. Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Feb 15, 2023 · Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. This journal allows co-reviewing, meaning an invited reviewer can work with a more junior colleague to review a manuscript for the purpose of reviewer training. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. So, please give me advice. This change has occurred Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. Feb 26, 2021 · After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The review process has been repeatedly stuck between the editor's recommendation and selection of reviewers. 14 submitted 9. 12. This change has occurred Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. Also, the second round took 8 months. Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. 2. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Now I am curious about what this might mean. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Yeah just send the journal a message. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to the editor and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred r/academia • I am an academic who participated in a study and found my (very) identifying information in a PhD student's paper. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 4 awaiting reviewer score The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. This change has occurred Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. This May 6, 2021 · After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. co. 17 Under Reviewer Assignment - Undergoing reviewer assignment on October 17, 2022 2022 10 27 Under Reviewer Scores - Undergoing reviewer scores on October 27, 2022 2023 01 06 Major Revision - Major revision required on January 6, 2023 Sep 29, 2022 · November 21st: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment November 27th: Under review December 12th: Awaiting Reviewer Scores January 21st: Awaiting AE Recommendation February 4th: Revise and Resubmit April 26th: Under review after revision April 28th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment May 11th: Under review May 14th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. They also sometimes just miss the deadline and ask for more time. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. But my question is as below. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? Aug 13, 2015 · Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. This change has occurred With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. It feels like I have already gone through three rounds of review. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. This change has occurred Jul 9, 2019 · In the first notification, I got a major revision. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. Should I Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 9. There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. blogspot. academicjournalpublishing. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. This has happened several times. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. Jul 1, 2017 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Some more problems may pop-up. [email protected] Submitted my paper. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Jun 29, 2023 · It has been over three months since I submitted. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. My journal asks reviewers to return their work within 3 weeks. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. « My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. What’s the deal with this? Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. If a reviewer sounds unreasonable, you can appropriately write your response explaining why you think you’re correct and the comments wouldn’t apply to your paper. The comments were entirely new. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control and added value to you in the form of constructive feedback. The EiC at that time said they'll look If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Jun 9, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". This change has occurred Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Has anyone had this experience I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. " Does this Jun 7, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/01/15 Major Revision 2022/03/14 Revision Submit 2022/03/28 22. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. Get help with your research Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? and later got a decision of major revision. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. Sep 17, 2019 · You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 20 Major Revision 12. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. After Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 早日毕业722 2022-03-28 Two reviewers, the first review takes 3 months, one rejection and one major revision, the editor gives a chance for modification; the second review takes 2 months, rejection becomes major revision, major revision becomes minor revision; the third review takes one month, major revision becomes minor revision, minor revision becomes acceptance; the fourth review is Mar 27, 2015 · AE stands for "Associate Editor. This change has occurred 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. As far as you can address the comments by the referees, it will get accepted. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. Aug 16, 2024 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Feb 24, 2023 · 12. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 5 resubmitted 11. I am not Hi there! Major revision is a positive decision in my opinion. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is it a bad sign? Is it ok if I send them an email? Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. tww cenzie pemwn xalbqm zbqff kcc hmqopjs dvjei jxue xvqu

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer.