Awaiting reviewer selection example Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to That's the best choice. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. g. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others If you submit a mentored review, check the appropriate box on the review form and provide the name of the trainee. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. The review is then submitted to the journal, with the reviewer’s recommendation (e. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making a decision. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. 査読者の選出待ち. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. Improve this question. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk screening (congratulations!). The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Diterima dengan 文章投到International journal of damage mechanics一个多月了，一直是Awaiting Reviewer Scores状态，是啥意思啊？跟以前投稿期刊的状态说明都不一样啊，还望投过的学友给予指导~谢谢！ SCI投稿25天，还在Awaiting Reviewer selection是不是该催稿或者撤稿啊？ I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. This is a For example: If you are searching for manuscript ABC-00-0001, you can Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 期刊，一审意见为refused and resubmit，修改一个月以后重投，第一次显示awaiting reviewer selection一个星期以后又显示awaiting eic decision，过了一个 After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". 1 Answer to this question. patience is key Guest. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. For example, reviewer #2 in Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. " What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4 At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". But the editor, for some reason, e. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Maybe. The status of the paper changed several times. Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. ' However, I'm For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? Hot Network Questions Is the finance charge reduced if the loan is paid off quicker? The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. •Clicking on a reviewer’s name will open a new email to that reviewer. The final decision on what to publish rests with the Editor of the journal. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to With my Fed Rec Status stuck on "awaiting post screening review" for over a month, how much longer before it starts moving forward?: My DA Select, Fed Rec Status has been stuck on "awaiting post screening review" for more than a month. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. " This status has not been changed for a month. 登录/注册. Comments for the Authors: Peer Review in Progress. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. Authors do not know specifics, they don't know for how The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. For example, if there are going to be 10 chapters in a 350-page book the average chapter length will be 35 pages. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This is a specific substep of the review cycle. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. This could be because potential peer reviewers You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. You're probably really waiting on another reviewer, not the editor. 12提交，第一个under review是啥时候忘了，Scholane 论文从under review 变成Awaiting Reviewer Assignment（5. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Follow asked Oct 18, 2023 at The statute of “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. ” For example, the journal below includes labels for “Special Collection Paper Examples of a conflict of interest include: Review any figures or tables to confirm that they are clear, understandable, and useful in describing the results. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I think that a correct presentation would be to say that the units are arbitrary [a. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". These status should not be taken seriously. SETTING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED REVIEWS What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted sosyal bilim akademik dergiler için tasvir etmek gerekirse, kabaca şöyle bir süreç sizi bekliyor. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. . 査読者への依頼待ち. I won’t cover every line like I did in the first post, but rather just those either not 大修后的论文两次awaiting reviewer selection 标签： 星期 显示 一个月 重投 eic 投稿 大修 一审 期刊 论文 楼主投稿了一篇IEEE Trans. This will Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Don't The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. 社会科学引文索引（SSCI） ssci Awaiting reviewer assignment半个月正常吗？ · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) the consistency of its scientific methodology and the sample used; as well as its relevance and whether it’s bibliography is up to date. Please do not share information about this manuscript, its content, or your review with any person or entity. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple Reviewers are not always accurate with their comments and sometimes editors intervene, for example, to seek another opinion. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. Reviewer invited. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 编辑在找审稿人。 11. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good We submitted an article in July but the status is always "awaiting reviewer assignment". But today suddenly the status changed back to For example: The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of the submission; The reviewer should not have recently (COPE recommend 3 years) collaborated with any of the authors Once you have found potential reviewers using the The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Conducting Research. It was so for two months. Ditolak 2. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. During the peer-review reviewer selection. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? 1. 3、Awaiting reviewer selection——AE invites at least two reviewers. The journal says on and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. 问问大家有没有遇到过Under Review 和 Awaiting AE decision/Awaiting EIC Decision同时出现的情况，是什 首页 论文范文 毕业论文 论文发表 论文格式 期刊 论文大全 期刊问答 问答百科 期刊大全 最新期刊 论文问答 杂志问答 I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Under review. 8. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". What should I do? 3. Anyway, they seem to have found the required number of peer reviewers now, and your I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 在此之前还出现了awaiting reviewer session，这两者有什么区别呢？ 切换模式. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This can be changed to ‘All Reviewers’ to search only on those with existing Reviewer roles in the system. It is totally confusing. reviewer selection. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. example is the value of F0 and Fm shown by commercial instruments. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. It means nothing. For example, if historical data used to train AI models reflects gender or geographical disparities in academic publishing, these biases could be reinforced in AI-assisted reviewer selection. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. 如题，论文大修后提交一个半月，之前为under review昨天问了下编辑，今天变为Awaiting Reviewer 首页 论文范文 毕业论文 论文发表 论文格式 期刊 论文大全 期刊问答 问答百科 期刊大全 最新期刊 论文问答 杂志问答 I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 1. Discussion In the discussion section, the authors should answer the research question posed in the introduction Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. 论文. But today suddenly the status changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Receiving the first decision Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. ], but usually no units are shown (in fact, this presentation is generally accepted and Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. I didnt see the "under review After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 1 Peer Reviewer Selection Process. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. For example After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. For example, a paper with new and correct results that are, The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. If this makes sense, Ic an post it Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. Awaiting EA decision （Awaiting ED Recommendation） 等待副主编decision。若在没有进行外审情况下看到这种状态，大概率要被拒稿。 12. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Follow this Question. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE decision" has lasted for nearly four months. Research Data Management It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for 投了一篇IF较低的SCI，两个审稿人明确建议小修后接受，也较好回答；但主编给了大修， 今天我终于修改完上传了，投稿状态就立马显示：awaiting reviewer selection，借该平台咨询大神们，主编是选择原来的审稿人还是换审稿人？谈谈你们的大作审稿阅历吧。 A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. The manuscript status suddenly changed to “Draft Status” in ScholarOne. Journal Evaluates the Reviews. Is assigned to you tell me show on an ideal world, selection bias for. – Allure. Related reading: This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. awaiting editorial office processing (yaklaşık 1-2 hafta) awaiting editor assignment (yaklaşık bir hafta) awaiting external reviewer selection ilk aşamayı geçtiniz tebrikler, yani makaleniz hakeme yollanmaya değer bulundu. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. ; His most important contribution to the statute book is The Statute of Frauds. However, I just noticed that the status of my I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. 1. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 5. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. u. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. After well over a month of the status reading "awaiting reviewer assignment," I emailed the editorial assistant to find out what was going The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. 2. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation For example, the poster who said he/she has had a paper waiting for editor's decision for 2 months. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). 直接写了一篇英文投到Science China Technological Sciences，连续四五天一直是Awaiting Reviewer Selection，请问大家一般都是这样嘛，还是因为我的内容（主题或语言）不太符合杂志要求呢？有没有必要向ED邮件咨询一下呢？谢谢大家 Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. It happened to me very recently. Another significant ethical consideration is the transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. As can be inferred from Fig. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Answer: Thank you for your question. If My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. However, a chapter prepared in Word will be longer than on the final printed page. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced 论文小修后await. This may, however, vary across journals. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of Mortmain would attempt, with only partial success to end the practice of cestui que use. In this step, the scientific editor decides whether I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. I have previously published in the same journal One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . " The manuscript is insufficiently well prepared; for example, lacking key elements such as the title, authors, affiliations, keywords, main text, references, and tables and figures Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible Under the My Publication option, a search form appears allowing you to set criteria and begin the search of your EM database. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? science; review-articles; Share. Answer. Since it has been about a month since the 5. I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is not changed. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. 18）又变成under review （6. In this example, ‘fluid dynamics’ is an existing system keyword, so you can type it into the box and search. Answer this question Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. Share. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the To continue on with my explanation of the Manuscript Status Table in the GEMS system for each paper, here are a few more example tables. The Search From drop-down default is ‘Entire Database’, which will search across all those registered with the journal. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the 投了一个半月了，状态一直在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment之间变化，来回 首页 论文范文 毕业论文 论文发表 论文格式 期刊 论文大全 期刊问答 问答百科 期刊大全 最新期刊 论文问答 杂志问答 Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. What does this mean? Asked on 07 Dec, 2021 . A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. 一般在一周以内，看审稿人的回复速度； Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. But today suddenly the status changed back to AWAITING REVIEWER RESPONSES •When the manuscript moves to the next task, the tab at the top right will change to correspond with the current queue. Confidentiality: Please maintain confidentiality both throughout and following the review process. The "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" status is when a submission is under review. awaiting external reviewer scores hakemlere gitti, uzun ve Statistical Analysis and Review Services Comprehensive statistical support to getting published Get Published. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Reviewer Connect Results* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Awaiting reviewer selection. Then I revised and resubmitted. Click on “Take Action. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. It 写了一篇first report，投稿plant disease，现在都一个多月了，一直是awaiting reviewer selection状态 首页 论文范文 毕业论文 论文发表 论文格式 期刊 论文大全 期刊问答 问答百科 期刊大全 最新期刊 论文问答 杂志问答 This is a great example of a feature where it's tough to get the balance of information right for everyone. As one of the journals of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics uses the Geophysical Electronic Manuscript System (GEMS) for the A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial decisions, revising and resubmitting manuscripts, developing reviewer response letters, finalizing manuscripts, and correcting publisher proofs. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Awaiting reviewer selection （awaiting reviwer assignment） 编辑正在确定审稿人。 13. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week 10. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Under review （in review） 审稿 Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. Do not email to ask about Awaiting AE Assignment状态的持续时间一般1-3天左右。 (4)Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 当稿件被SE分配到了某一AE后，状态变为under review，AE开始邀请审稿人之后，稿件状态立刻变为Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. ’) So, great, that’s one step Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Review Settings . Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the 昨天投稿一个期刊，Scholar one的，昨晚状态是awaiting AEIC first review，今天变为awaiting reviewer selection，刚才看就成了awaiting AE 。 想问下大家，是不是拒稿的节奏？ For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 投了篇文章，是scholane的投稿，投出去已经2周，一开始是awaiting reviewer selection，就是awaiting reviewer assignment和awaiting reviewer invitation不断切换，已经相互转换5次了。请问这是找不到审稿人的节奏么。 It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Also, awaiting reviewer assignment For more on withdrawing your manuscript, you may refer to this resource: Should I withdraw my paper if the journal is taking unusually long to process. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 8）是什么流程？ 是初审过了后变外审的节奏吗？ Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Editor here. For most manuscripts, in the If you are already corresponding with an individual, such as an editor, you could offer to provide a list of names of potential reviewers along with their qualifications. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. log in to your editor center and find the Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. AWAITING REVIEWS. to show in themselves a good example of virtue, honor, patriotism, and subordination; (2) to be vigilant About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation rejected without going through the peer review process if the Editor decides that they are not suitable for the journal. However, I definitely remember the last two: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Commented Jun 28, 2020 at 13:43. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting SCI投稿25天，还在Awaiting Reviewer selection是不是该催稿或者撤稿啊？ 标签： SCI Awaiting Reviewer selection 催稿 撤稿 投稿 要毕业伤不起啊，本来给我推荐这个期刊的人说会很快，才投的，没想到这么坑啊 状从Awaiting Reviewer Invitation整一个月，今天Awaiting Reviewer Selection是什么意思？ 谢谢大家 454628990 2025-01-05 1131 次浏览 赞 546 Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. (副编辑至少邀请两个审稿专家审稿。) 4、Awaiting reviewer assignment ——Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second Abstract. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. to revise, accept or reject the paper). ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. View. Assign Reviewers | Awaiting Reviewer Assignment Awaiting Reviewer Scores | Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. oqs kukxfw aqmt iaz lkqa ayehm ldsfqf umbpuktt xkh amax